If a piece of matter violates nature's law, it is not...
Laws of nature are not commands but statements of facts. The use of the word "law" in this context is rather unfortunate. It would be better to speak of uniformities in nature. This would do away with the elementary fallacy that a law implies a law giver. If a piece of matter does not obey a law of nature, it is punished. On the contrary, we say that the law has been incorrectly stated.
If a piece of matter violates nature's law, it is not punished because
it is not binding to obey it
there is no superior being to enforce the law of nature
it cannot be punished
it simply means that the facts have not been correctly stated by law
Correct answer is B
No explanation has been provided for this answer.
He asked me why did I call him a rogue. ...
For many centuries in Indian History there was no city so famous like the city of Ujjain. ...
One who does not believe in existence of God ...
The inhabitants of the island were barbarians. ...
He is too intelligent to make a mistake. ...
He was asked to accelerate the pace of work. ...