The distinction conferred by wealth
...The enjoyment of physical possession of things would seem to be one of the prerogatives of wealth which has been little impaired. Presumably nothing has happened to keep the man who can afford them from enjoying his Rembrandt and his homegrown orchids. But enjoyment of things has always been associated with the third prerogative of wealth which is the distinct it confers. In a world where nearly everyone was poor, the distinction was very great. It was the natural consequence of rarity.
In England it is widely agreed, the ducal families are not uniformly superior. There is a roughly normal incidence of intelligence and stupidity, good taste and bad taste, morality, immorality. But very few people are dukes and duchesses, although the later have become rather more frequent with modern easing of divorce laws.
As a result, even though they may be intrinsically unexpectional they are regarded with some awe. So it has long have been with the rich. Were dukes numerous, their position would deteriorate. As the rich have become more numerous, they have inevitably becomes a debased currency.
The distinction conferred by wealth
was unfair to the poor
was unlikely to spread throughout the world
was very great when there were many rich people
was very great when there were few rich people
Correct answer is D
No explanation has been provided for this answer.
He was in a hurry because he had an appointment with the company's director. ...
I could not put up in a hotel because the boarding and lodging charges were exorbitant. ...
What is the opposite of OBEYING? ...
Both of you two can come with me to the play tonight. ...
1. him 2. the 3. to 4. charge 5. handover ...
He dislikes the word dislike, isn't he ...
What is the opposite of PERENNIAL? ...
S1: Once upon a time, an ant lived on the bank of a river. P : The dove saw the ant struggling in...
Why did people get so much annoyed even with little provocation is a matter of investigation. ...