Which of the following statements may be assumed to be fa...
Modern economics does not differentiate between renewable and non-renewable materials, as its method is to measures everything by means of a money price. Thus, taking various alternatives fuels, like coal, oil, wood or water power: the only difference between them recognised by modern economics is relative cost per equivalent unit. The cheapest is automatically the one to be preferred, as to do otherwise would be irrational and 'uneconomic'.
From a Buddhist point of view of course this will not do, the essential difference between non-renewable fuels like coal and oil on the one hand and renewable fuels like wood and water power on the other cannot be simply overlooked. Non-renewable goods must be used only if they are indespensible, and then only with the greatest care and the highest concern for conservation. To use them carelessly or extravagantly is an act of violence, and while complete non-violence may not be possible on earth, it is nonetheless the duty of man to aim at deal of non-violence in all he does.
Which of the following statements may be assumed to be false from the information in the passage?
Of the above statements
1 and 2 are false
1, 2 and 4 are false
3 and 4 are false
All 1, 2, 3, and 4 are false
Correct answer is B
No explanation has been provided for this answer.
I do not recall exactly what he said to me but when I was quitting he said something to me. ...
Find the correctly spelt word. ...
What is the synonym of CONNOISSEUR? ...
The young man appears to be quite headstrong. ...
However, different rulers and governments dealt with the different groups in a compartmentalised ...
Mr.Smith was accused for murder but the court found him not guilty and acquitted him. ...
The project did not appear to hold out bright prospects. ...