Fill in the blanks with the appropriate pair of phrases:<...
Modern economics does not differentiate between renewable and non-renewable materials, as its method is to measures everything by means of a money price. Thus, taking various alternatives fuels, like coal, oil, wood or water power: the only difference between them recognised by modern economics is relative cost per equivalent unit. The cheapest is automatically the one to be preferred, as to do otherwise would be irrational and 'uneconomic'.
From a Buddhist point of view of course this will not do, the essential difference between non-renewable fuels like coal and oil on the one hand and renewable fuels like wood and water power on the other cannot be simply overlooked. Non-renewable goods must be used only if they are indespensible, and then only with the greatest care and the highest concern for conservation. To use them carelessly or extravagantly is an act of violence, and while complete non-violence may not be possible on earth, it is nonetheless the duty of man to aim at deal of non-violence in all he does.
Fill in the blanks with the appropriate pair of phrases:
The passage suggests that while a modern economist, considers it uneconomic to use ...... form of fuel, a Buddhist economist considers it uneconomic to use ...... form a fuel
a cheap, a renewable
an irrational, an essential
an expensive, a non-renewable
a rational, an unessential
Correct answer is C
No explanation has been provided for this answer.
Which of the following should be the second sentence ? ...
I have a bone to pick with you in this matter. ...
S1: A ceiling on urban property. P : No mill-owner could own factories or mills or plants. Q :...
Find the correctly spelt word. ...
He asked me why did I call him a rogue. ...
Speech can be curse, because it can ...
Manish neglected to remit the fees in time and therefore had to pay a fine. ...
For some days the new professor lectured above the heads of his pupils. ...